Does a More Expensive Bike Make a Better Cyclist?


You’re out riding, and you see a guy (or girl) on a pimped out $6,000 road bike….what’s the first thing that goes through your head?  Probably a few different things (and feel free to let me know what those things are with a comment below), but one possible thought is “man, this person must be a really good cyclist to have a bike like that”.

Possibly….but it could also just mean that he or she has a lot of money available to sink into a bike.

Okay, so lets flip it and put a really good cyclist on a cheap no-name road bike….what happens?  A lot of discomfort, perhaps….but I’m thinking that they’re still going to kick my butt as long as it’s in good working condition.

There is no doubt that buying a good quality bike is worth the money and will alleviate a lifetime of unnecessary repairs and grief.  But once you buy a good quality bike, what is the increased performance/amount spent graph look like?

I debate this question quite often.  Maybe I use it as a way to justify the thought of me walking into a bike shop and dropping a few thousand on a bike, so that I can upgrade to a new one.  Maybe it really would help with my performance.  It’s a tough call.  I’d be very interested in hearing your thoughts on this one.

What I do know, is that Canadians are buying less bikes, but ones of better quality.  Momentum Magazine has listed that:

Companies that supply bicycles to independent Canadian bike shops have reported an increase in overall sales for 2009, but a decrease in the number of bikes sold. Combined with a 23 per cent spike in the average price of bikes that were sold to retailers, the Bicycle Trade Association of Canada (BTAC) says this indicates a trend towards consumers buying higher quality bikes in the independent bike shop sector.

It looks like Canadians have got the first part right, and realize that it makes good sense to buy quality… where are the studies showing me performance vs price?

Okay, Alleycat Racers, it’s your turn to voice your opinion.  Please leave a comment with your name and race number…but before you click the ‘Yehuda Moon’ image to go to the next checkpoint, let us know what you think. Does a more expensive bike make a better cyclist?

Enjoy Your Ride

Tags: ,

Pin It

153 Responses to “ Does a More Expensive Bike Make a Better Cyclist? ”

  1. JM on December 6, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    a better bike can make a better cyclist. compare a $100 bike to a $1000 bike. The person on the $1000 bike will go faster with the same effort. However, the difference between a $3000 and a $4000 is a lot smaller.

  2. Debbie on December 6, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    Debbie #4848 – I don’t think it matters.

  3. Iwakura on December 6, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Another site added to my favs ;)


  4. ryan on December 6, 2010 at 12:16 pm

    For less than one percent of cyclists a more expensive bike will make a better cyclist. Much more of it can be attributed to natural ability and training. If you aren’t pro- then your $500-1000 bike is more than likely just fine.

  5. samh on December 6, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    A better bike does not inherently make a better cyclist. – #1565

  6. Tom on December 6, 2010 at 11:49 am

    If we’re talking about someone going from a janky wal-mart bike to a real bike shop bike, yes, the proper bike does make a difference.


  7. Dan Harrelson on December 6, 2010 at 11:48 am


  8. Widsith on December 6, 2010 at 11:47 am

    #1330 thinks it’s the cyclist that matters, not the price of the bike. As an astronomer told me in my youth, when I was describing my cheap, difficult-to-use telescope to him: “Learn to do a good job with the equipment you have, and someday, when you get something better, you’ll be amazed at how much better you’ll do because you’ve already had to learn to do your very best under difficult cirmcumstances.”

  9. Mark Balawender on December 6, 2010 at 11:40 am

    2530–It all depends what better means for you. More expensive right now seems to mean lighter and more stylish, but with all the focus on bike commuting I think we’ll see it shift to more reliable, more comfortable, and better utility. In all seriousness, does anyone really believe that a dura ace shifter is twice as good as a 105 shifter, or however many times better than deore or acera? Could one even tell the difference between those rear derailers without seeing the name printed on them or a gram scale? I venture that it would be impossible to tell just from shifting and that any of the deore and up level stuff would last the same amount of time. In fact, the heavier stuff might last longer. The focus on levels of components seems to have gone the way of high end audio stuff–the perceived benefits are just perceived (not actual) and are manufactured by advertising to justify a ridiculous price to the rich.

  10. Mark on December 6, 2010 at 11:39 am

    #2530–It all depends what better means for you. More expensive right now seems to mean lighter and more stylish, but with all the focus on bike commuting I think we’ll see it shift to more reliable, more comfortable, and better utility. In all seriousness, does anyone really believe that a dura ace shifter is twice as good as a 105 shifter, or however many times better than deore or acera? Could one even tell the difference between those rear derailers without seeing the name printed on them or a gram scale? I venture that it would be impossible to tell just from shifting and that any of the deore and up level stuff would last the same amount of time. In fact, the heavier stuff might last longer. The focus on levels of components seems to have gone the way of high end audio stuff–the perceived benefits are just perceived (not actual) and are manufactured by advertising to justify a ridiculous price to the rich.

  11. Den on December 6, 2010 at 11:39 am

    Den #7685

    A more expensive bike DOES NOT make you a better cyclist. It’s not the price of the bike… it’s the ability of the rider!

  12. Mister A on December 6, 2010 at 11:38 am

    8310 Money doesn’t make you a better cyclist only the desire to move forward.

  13. welshcyclist on December 6, 2010 at 11:27 am

    I honestly dont know, I’ve only ever ridden “cheap” bikes, when I was a boy, my mates and I made our own bikes from pieces scounged from the scrapyard, that was in the 1950’s. Since starting to ride again about 7 years ago, the most I’ve paid for a bike is £199, which has proved fit for purpose.

  14. Reuben Collins on December 6, 2010 at 11:20 am

    #5290 expensive better!!!

  15. Badda Skat on December 6, 2010 at 11:18 am

    It definitely does NOT make a better cyclist. To me, I find that the riders that don’t have much money to blow on bikes tend to be those that not only know the most about their bike, but also put in more hours on it.

    Badda Skat #6233

  16. John J Wilde on December 6, 2010 at 10:59 am

    Wow this is addicting.
    Xtrajack #1455

  17. Xander on December 6, 2010 at 10:59 am

    Hi. #2293 here.
    I’m not going to read every post, so maybe its already been stated: but I think generally your dollar/quality ratio goes up pretty fast up to about $1000. After that, it tapers off slowly, then rapidly and you get into law of diminishing returns etc.

    Now, if the question is does a “quality” bike make a better cyclist? Then yes. Put two cyclists of equal ability each on a high end bike and a low end bike and have them race. Then swap and have them race again. The better bike will be with the winner each time, I hypothesize.

  18. cycler on December 6, 2010 at 10:54 am

    I think that to a certain minimum threshold of good quality components, a more expensive bike helps, but after that there’s no real correlation
    Cycler 4505

  19. Ian Prust on December 6, 2010 at 10:53 am

    Ian Prust

  20. Thomas on December 6, 2010 at 10:49 am

    It really is not the bike it is how you use it!


  21. DK on December 6, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Heck no. Riding your bike a bunch makes you a better cyclist. Now, having a nice bike can make your experience more pleasant, lead to more riding, which in turn will make you a better cyclist…but it’s not a direct result of an expensive bike.

    #812 DFL?

  22. Jami on December 6, 2010 at 10:43 am

    I definitely don’t think that you need an expensive bike…actually a pricey bike might actually make you a worse cyclist since you don’t have as many obstacles to overcome.


  23. Alan@EcoVelo on December 6, 2010 at 10:38 am


    Feelin’ the bonk coming on…

  24. Brent Strange on December 6, 2010 at 10:34 am

    #2277 for the Alleycat. No a more expensive bike does not make you a better cyclist. If anything it makes you a bit more paranoid about having something damage the bike.

  25. goathens on December 6, 2010 at 10:22 am

    goathens # 7561
    I think once you are beyond the absolute cheapest bike (in it’s class, a cheap folder costs much more than a cheap mtnbike, but it is still crappy), it doesn’t matter so much. just so long as it isn’t falling apart- but who cares about titaniums and all of that.
    If anything, it’s a correlation without causation that bike$$$ = better appearing cyclist.

  26. Jean on December 6, 2010 at 10:17 am


    You need functional equipment, but the cyclist is so much more important than the bike.

  27. NewGirl! on December 6, 2010 at 10:14 am

    This post starts with the assumption that the cyclist is a roadie. Like Yehuda and Joe demonstrate, there are many different attitudes and views on bicycles. Price should never be the differentiater between a ‘good’ cyclist and a ‘better’ one. But I resist the ‘good’ descriptor anyway – we’re all cyclists, why try to make someone better than the other?

    • NewGirl! on December 6, 2010 at 10:14 am

      I’m #8706 if that matters :)

  28. andy on December 6, 2010 at 10:13 am

    thanks for helping host the alleycat! Andy, #6749

  29. Aaron on December 6, 2010 at 10:12 am

    I agree that there is a minimum threshold for bike quality/price. However, once you cross that threshold (i.e. the bike fits and has no major mechanical problems) only the most elite athletes will reap any benefit from more expensive gear. So no, a more expensive bike does not make the cyclist better. 5827

  30. Claire on December 6, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Claire #1186

    A higher-end bike probably brings more convenience, durability, and comfort, but if a person really loves cycling I think they will bike no matter how “cheap” their trusty steed is (provided it actually works). There’s probably a point at which higher prices deliver diminishing returns as well.

  31. aaron 8363 on December 6, 2010 at 10:04 am

    Nope. steel is the only material that will overcome the zombie war!

    • Darryl on December 6, 2010 at 10:11 am

      Congratulations on finding this checkpoint.

  32. mrben on December 6, 2010 at 10:02 am

    checking in #3089

    Plus…. I hope not – my bike was given to me free :(

    In my experience the quality of the biker cannot be determined by his bike, be it the price, the condition, or anything. It’s mostly aligned to the frequency of riding, and the attitude of the rider. ref. Yehuda and Joe – very different bikes, looks, styles, but both “better” cyclists. (Although you could debate about Yehuda).

  33. Nico P on December 6, 2010 at 9:42 am

    nico.p, #9302

    I think all bikes, both low and high end have a place. That said, it’s hard to get into commuting, etc. with a bike that breaks down all the time, so there is *some* threshold for quality needed.

  34. caribbeancwby on November 26, 2010 at 7:26 am

    what’s the title of this post? oh yeah here’s my two cents for it’s probably worth half of a penny.

    1) the right bike has to start with sizing, honestly many associates have not the slightest clue to even start with this important subject. just cause you ride a mountain bike, work in a bike shop doesn’t qualify for you as an expert. to better help the customer find the right bike, seek knowledge, ask questions and act cordial. there’s no excuse to act like a hot shot.

    2) well bike fitting is a huge key to becoming a better cyclist. so we’ve got the size down, now comes spending extra money: shoes, pedals, seat, possibly a new stem or handlebar. what does all this mean? the feet, butt, hands these are all contact points, keys to comfort wether its quick or an all day jaunt rely so much on proper bike fit. seek out someone who at least understands anatomy also.

    3) its attitude to simplify things. I cannot stress how many folks I’ve met over the years who walk in really with a pessimistic mindset. “oh I’m afraid, gonna fall on these skinny tires, this handlebar is foreign to me?” failure in every way possible. as the sale associate its your job to sell them not only a bike yet to convince them its fresh, exciting, healthy even instill confidence in a novice.

    so back the question “does a more expensive bike make you a better cyclist?” absolutely not, find a local bike shop you can trust in, they will help you grow to be a better cyclist.

    • Darryl on November 26, 2010 at 7:34 am

      Great tips. I appreciate you including your professional opinion….and adding to this post.


  35. JD on October 13, 2010 at 11:49 am

    I’ve enjoyed all the comments on this post so far. Some really open and honest ones that question, and congratulate, the value (or “investment” as I like to say) sunk into a high-end bike. I spent just under a £1K on my new road bike, but have clearly spent several hundred more in support of my bike on shoes, helmet, specs, lights and that “oh-so-lovely” lycra wear!

    I don’t think it’s instantly made me into a GC rider, but my interest sure has shot up: I’ve joined a local cycling club; and I fully intend to take my training much more seriously – I’m even looking at riding track too!


    • Loving the Bike on October 13, 2010 at 3:02 pm

      Thanks, John, for jumping in and including your comments. I appreciate your feedback and information from your side of the world.


  36. victor on October 11, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    Spending 1k gets you a decent road bike so why on earth would someone spend 3k, or even 15k on a bike? I have built many high end road bikes over the years and have seen one common thread with almost all riders that buy an expensive custom road bike. They become better riders… Is it the bike? No not exactly. Its how the rider interacts with the bike. Maybe its that you spent all this money and your wife or husband is going to kill you if you dont ride it. What ever the reason out of all the riders that I work and have worked with, the ones that seem to get the most out of their cycling have super high end bikes.
    Certainly we dont need the super duper bikes but if its something you enjoy?????

    • Darryl on October 11, 2010 at 9:15 pm

      Interesting perspective, Victor. Thanks for sharing it. Yeah, I’m sure the pride of having a nice expensive bike (and a spouse making sure you get good use out of all that money) helps people become better riders when they purchase a high priced bike.


      • Annalisa on October 13, 2010 at 8:21 am

        To this point, which is sort of what I was getting at in my reply, I am waiting for a custom ANT lady Boston Roadster (and could not be more excited). It was spendy for sure! But I know that it will fit and handle extremely well, based on my test ride. And once it gets properly fitted? Watch out, Boston. :)

        To me, it’s worth it, because it will be my primary mode of transportation.

        I also plan to build up a Surly LHT for touring. That will be a much lower cost bike, but as long as it’s properly fitted, it will be great.

        • victor on October 13, 2010 at 8:36 am


          I agree. Congratulations on making the leap. The ant bikes are awesome! Post some pics when its done. On your fit though. You should always think of fit first then select a bike based on your specifics. Not all bikes can be adjusted to fit your body. On a commuter bike certain aspects of your position may not be that important but on a touring or racing bike small tweaks can make a huge improvement in your overall enjoyment.

    • Beginner on May 11, 2014 at 1:47 am

      That’s the coolest comment!
      Yeah is it something u enjoy doing not fear of someone, fear of being looked down upon, fear of losing a competition by a lower end bike. We really do not need a carbon bike to go from point A to B.

  37. Nathan on October 10, 2010 at 8:11 am

    Stress the engine.
    The engine!!

    Even on a solid entry level road bike with a good fit – ahhh – stress the engine.
    It really is a game of chess on wheels. A nice board and pieces makes for an more enjoyable game – break it down – the player is the one who will win the game.

  38. smoke remedy on October 9, 2010 at 4:04 am

    Thats exact what I have searched for. I imagine with this basics I can get much more details.

  39. Darryl on October 8, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    I just re-read over all of your comments tonight. I feel that out of all the posts I’ve written since starting this blog, this post has generated the most incredible responses. Thanks to each and every one of you. Sell42, Clive, Tim, Torsten, Welshcyclist, Clay, Michelle, Bikerly, Annalisa, Charlie, and Megbikes….thank you. Well Done.


  40. Charlie Quimby on October 8, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    Riding “a” bike is an odd concept to me. I may have spent more than six grand for my rides, but nothing more than about $1.6k on my best one. They cover riding in two different states and all kinds of weather and purposes.

    Today, I rode a fat-tire one speed cobbled together from a bunch of different bikes and rode home with a case of beer in the basket. Never have to lock it because it’s too weird and rusty, yet it gets the most compliments for the same reason. Later, I took my dog for a trot with a Swobo 3-speed I ride all winter. This weekend, 40 miles or so on my road bike.

    You get the idea.

  41. Megbikes on October 8, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    All of these points are very good. I have to admit, though, that having a really nice bike, which was custom built for me, definitely makes me want to ride more than a less expensive bike. It doesn’t necessarily make me ride any faster, but it is more fun to ride and it fits me better than other bikes, so I am more comfortable and enjoy myself more on it. I got a chance to do a kind of field test to prove this, actually- my nice bike was stolen and I wound up borrowing a $600 Bianchi road bike from a friend, which I rode but kind of loathed because it was a bit heavy and, more important, it didn’t fit me well and I was always reaching too far for the handlebars. I thought I was probably glorifying my old bike in my mind, imagining it to be better than it was- however, 8 months later, I miraculously recovered my bike, and the first time I rode it again after I got it back was absolutely glorious. It really did handle better, it fit me better, it was faster, and it was all around more fun to ride than the other bike. I think a $600 (or a $200 or $100 or free) bike can be great, as long as it fits you and you enjoy riding it. In my case, getting my nice bike back was really the instigating factor in me getting back to a more regular riding habit. And, although I invested about $2500 in it initially, that was almost 10 years ago, and I ride it nearly every day, so I feel like I’m getting a good value out of it.

  42. Loving the Bike on October 8, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    I really like how everyone commented with a lot of detail. It means a lot to see you guys digging in and expressing yourselves like this. Very cool.

    This topic is a very interesting one to debate and it’s great to see your comments.


    • bikerly on October 8, 2010 at 3:33 pm

      Great post, Darryl. I’m preparing an infograph response.

      • Darryl on October 8, 2010 at 9:48 pm

        If anyone could sum up and clear up this topic, it is you (and one of your graphs).


  43. Annalisa on October 8, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    I think it all boils down to how to quantify quality.

    There is a significant difference between a $100 Walmart bike and the $600 Giants and Treks of the world in terms of build quality, how they are assembled, and how long they will last without problems for sure.

    It gets tricky when you start talking about the differences between that $600 bike and a higher-end model. At some point, there is a law of diminishing returns in play and it’s time in the saddle that will make the difference as a rider.

    Like I told my friend who was considering two frames with a 1lb and $500 difference – “OR, you could just lose a pound or two.” :) If he was an age-group competitive triathlete that would be one thing, but as a “weekend warrior” it probably won’t make a bunch of difference, day to day.

    Then again, if having a fancy bike means you get out on the roads more (and thus start improving as a cyclist), then perhaps it’s worth it to you. In any case, it’s not my place to pass judgement on how much you spend on your bike, how much you ride it, or what your form looks like.

  44. Michelle (mksinmd) on October 8, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    I don’t care what people ride. I think it is good that they are out there riding. If you maintain any bike it will last for years to come. I went from a tank of a hybrid/communter bike to Cannondale Fem C4 when I made the decision to do more road cycling and get into doing triathlons. Yes I spend a few $$ on my bike, but I had made the decision that I wanted carbon after trying many different bikes in prices above and below what I spent. I planned for this expense in my budget and I knew I would be riding it for many years and many miles. Never once have I regretted this decision. I have a bike I love and that fits me. Does it make me faster? Well compared to the tank I was riding – yes. Compared to a lower end model of a Cannondale – I don’t know. I have become a better cyclist since I bought this bike, but that is mainly because I have been foucsing on cycling, riding year round and learning from better cyclists. Those gains could have happened on any bike I am sure.

  45. Clay on October 8, 2010 at 11:12 am

    I look at the rider to see how they ride.
    I pity this combination: expensive bike + poor form.
    I respect this combination: expensive bike + good form OR cheap bike + good form.

  46. welshcyclist on October 8, 2010 at 8:42 am

    I’m with Sell42 on this one, if you’re a real cyclist, you just want to be out there pedalling. My bike cost £250, it does the job fine, and I’ve just paid £38 for a new chain and rear cassette fitted. That’s after 7000 miles plus in 9-10 months use, good enough for me. Sure I’d love the daddy of all bikes, but would it make a whole lot of difference to me, or my present lifestyle? I think not.

  47. Torsten on October 8, 2010 at 8:11 am

    I recently upgraded, but I went used. Riding comfort is a big deal to me and I’m happy with my choice: 2008 Trek Madone 5.1 w/ a couple of upgrades. I was riding a 1997 Lemond Buenos Aires, which is still in good working order.

    As for seeing that really expensive bike on the road, it makes me want to chase it down…but that’s pretty much true of anyone I see out there when I’m riding alone. :)

  48. Tim on October 8, 2010 at 7:59 am

    For most cyclists there is a diminishing return curve. For the average weekend warrior is there really a performance benefit to buying that pricey carbon fiber handle bar? Does the few ounces you save on a set of SRAM Red component get you anything more than a bigger credit card bill? Probably not.

    For my own part, I bought a mid-level Specialized road bike. Why did I pick that particular model? Not sure other than it met my price point and had a good feel. The shop had models with slightly less cost and the same performance. However, I knew that I didn’t like the entry level bikes.

    And I’ll echo what Clive said. For certain styles of bike there are definitely minimum standards you want.

    But no, a more pricey bike does not guarantee a better cyclist. Just as in the motoring world, where the skill of the driver seems to have an inversion relationship to the cost of their car.

  49. Clive Chapman on October 8, 2010 at 5:55 am

    I use a Giant Defy 2 for my roadbike, very much an entry level road bike and costs around £900, according to my iPhone currency converter that’s roughly $1400.

    That’s expensive to some (me for instance) and mere small change to others.

    I think most committed cyclist will pay the max their budget will allow. I know that committed cyclists will also spend the money to get a better experience in the saddle.

    As for MTBing then you do need to spend due to safety, I cringe when out on my trails and I see folk launching themselves off various drop offs and slopes on what we call in the UK £100 Halfords specials. They’re not bikes but bike shaped objects totally unfit for purpose and some are downright dangerous used as a proper MTB!

    So I can’t really answer your question Darryl, just spew forth random observations. Although sometimes with some of the bikes I see a phrase we used in the Army a lot keeps coming to mind. “All the gear and no idea!”

  50. Sell42 on October 8, 2010 at 5:34 am

    I use to think having a higher quality bike was a must. However, this summer has changed my mind on this. I ride a lower end Trek 2.1 and have had zero issues keeping up with anyone. In fact it’s often been quite the opposite. I think roadies are big on spendy bikes. Cyclists just don’t care–just pedal–anyway–anyhow.

Leave a Reply


Featured on these top sites

Blog Partners

Cycling 360 Podcast


Sugar Alternatives for Energy and Hydration

Question: I am using the homebrew sugar formulations (sometimes added to green tea).  I am also trying to wean myself off 1/2 dose adrenalean “lip tonic delivery system” (biorhythm brand- caffeine, hoodia g, synephrine, yohimbe) capsule for energy.

My question is other than juice, can you suggest modifications in lieu of table sugar for energy and hydration.


Both raw/organic honey or agave can work great in the homebrew (substitute in the same quantities for the sugar, or to taste), but you do have to shake well in order to make sure they don’t settle out.  Have you tried either of these?  Also, make sure to use at least the minimum amount of salt recommended in the homebrew as the temps rise, you need the sodium replacement if you’re sweating.

Sports Drink Homebrew

Please send us your questions for our Expert Sports Nutritionist, Kelli Jennings to “Ask the Sports Nutritionist“. Kelli Jennings is a Registered Dietitian with a passion for healthy eating, wellness, & sports nutrition. For more information go to

Nutrition Tips